« chromeless player... | Main | What does MySpace... »
20080322 Saturday March 22, 2008

WPAFB develops Morgellons and Gay Bomb!

Everybody's heard of the "gay bomb"... I always thought it was an apocryphal tale of the Reagan Era. Alas, a document FOIA'd from Wright-Patterson Air-Force Base by the Sunshine Project has it written in plain language:

"chemicals that effect human
behavior... one distateful but nonlethal example would be strong
aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual
behavior"

The same document also provides details on the development of disease-based bioweapons that sound a lot like Morgellons disease. What is particularly striking is stated timeframe of the contract 1995-2000. In my opinion, this coincides with the timeline of the rise of Morgellons:

What is also interesting is around this same time-frame, searching bulletin-boards where medical professionals "talk shop"... there is a noticeable rise in dermatologists going "what's with the sudden increase in delusional parasitosis cases??" They'd note that in previous years, they'd seen at most one or two cases PER YEAR. Now they were seeing one or two cases PER MONTH. This began around 1995-1996. For a disease that is officially supposed to be "very rare" it is odd that there are no meta-analyses of the unexpected rapid rise in DOP cases.

The FOIA'd document details the kind of bioweapons being produced by the USAF, despite the fact that such weapons are banned by the Geneva Conventions:

"Chemicals that can be sprayed onto enemy positions or onto infiltration routes used by enemy forces. Three classes of chemical weapon are proposed:
Category #1: Chemicals that attract annoying creatures to the enemy position and make the creatures aggressive and annoying. Stinging and biting bugs, rodents, and larger animals would be candidates to be drawn to the enemy positions."

Most morgellons patients notice a significantly increased attraction by biting insects, in addition to already having skin that is on "hair trigger" for crawling sensations. If one were to find an insect on you, one remains more vigilant for others for a while... it's probably a natural neurological response. Morgellons patients rarely get to exit that state, except after IMHO appropriate antibiotic/antifungal/antiparasitic treatment as suggested in the latest serious peer-reviewed paper on morgellons, from a non-quack-psychiatry-based viewpoint (aka not "dr" John Koo's psychodermatology).

"Category #2: Chemicals that make lasting but nonlethal markings on the personnel.
    (a) Those that were exposed to the chemicals during travel on infiltration routes or from being sprayed while in the enemy camp could be easily identified (by smell or appearance) weeks later, making it impossible for them to blend with the local population. The chemical marking should also be annoying to the exposed individuals and to those around him/her. Spray equipment could be used as part of a perimeter defense system (if decontamination for friendly forces is available).
    (b) A variation on the theme would be that we would have the counteracting treatment, and affected personnel would have to come to us for the treatment. This version would be especially suitable for use against mixtures of enemy forces and non-combatants. Civilians would come to us for treatment, and the enemy forces that did not seek treatment could be identified.
    (c) A more subtle version would be some lasting chemical marker that was not obvious to humans, but would be obvious to trained dogs or special detecting equipment. These chemicals could be sprayed on infiltration routes. Marked individuals would not know they were marked, and would not know how the dogs/equipment identified them."

Such "markings" and feelings "annoying to the exposed individuals" look like this picture from EMSResponder.com article on Morgellons. The caption reads "AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli ROSEVILLE CA USA-Verna Gallagher, who claims to be suffering from a rare
infliction called, Morgellons, points to a sore on her skin that she
believes the bugs of the condition emerged from, at her Roseville,
Calif., home, Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2006. Like others with the condition,
Gallagher, 48, said she has a crawling sensation on her skin, that is
caused by bugs that emerge from the skin but do not act like they are."

"Category #3: Chemicals That effect (sic) human behavior so that discipline and morale in enemy units is adversely effected (sic). One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior. Another example would be a chemical that made personnel very sensitive to sunlight."

Two major epicenters of this disease are Los Angeles and San Francisco -- with the latter being one of the "red zones" from morgellons.org data, and also a major center of  "homosexual behavior" and equally liberal/tine heterosexual behavior as well. There might even be an early stage of this disease which foments an aphrodesiac phase to those parasitized, for the purpose of spreading the infection. Once the tertiary (like syphillis) stage with lesions starts, it is less likely to spread by sexual contact because the sufferer ends up looking like the photos below.  Lyme is already known to effect hormone levels and cause behavioral changes, so it is entirely possible that those mental  effects attributed to Morgellons are strictly an aspect of the Lyme "coinfection" that appears to be present in many (if properly tested) Morgellons cases. The Mayo Clinic lists the following incapacitating (non cutaneous/appearance) aspects of this disease:

  • Crawling sensations on and under the skin, often compared to insects moving, stinging or biting
  • Joint and muscle pain
  • Fatigue significant enough to interfere with daily activity
  • Inability to concentrate and difficulty with short-term memory
  • Behavioral changes

Finally, a timeline is offered in the WPAFB bioweapons contract:. Note that "field tests" of the bioweapon end Sept. 98, and the first NUSPA site appears December '98:

Project Plan: (Assume start date 1 Oct 94)
a. Step 1: select/assign DOD organizations with expertise to run/participate in the development programs. Participating organizations should provide knowledge about medicine, chemical manufacturing, and weapons applications/use. Completion Feb 95.

b. Step 2: select types/categories of chemicals to be developed (Completion 1 May 95) Then, have various companies develop chemicals and conduct laboratory tests. Complete 1 Dec 97.

d.(sic) Step 3: Conduct field tests in different climates/conditions with chemicals known to have acceptable toxicity to determine effectiveness and best application techniques/procedures. Completion 1 Sep 98.

e. Step 4: Produce effective and safe chemicals in large quantities and conduct operational evaluations, so perhaps include selected use during actual hostilities.
Complete 1 Sep 00

Now the question is ... what constitutes "hostilities?" Does the "war on drugs" count as a "hostility"? Because, apparently, the fusarium-based defoliant they've been spraying on drug crops appears to be affecting humans too! -- http://www.narconews.com/~myco/Mycoherbicide.info/

And true to the FOIA'd document, humans exposed to these bioweapons "anywhere along the infiltration route" would create "lasting markings (smell or appearance) on exposed personnel. The obvious markings should also be annoying to exposed and adjacent personnel, and difficult or impossible to remove."

What do those "lasting markings" that are annoying and impossible to remove look like? They look like Amy Winehouse who appears to have Morgellons

wineh.jpgBleeding arm Amy Winehousearm.jpg Amy Winehouse's skin disease

 

Looks like the "marking" spread to her husband... which is possible since the Lyme component of Morgellons is potentially sexually transmissible, as it has several million years of parasitic evolution beyond the sexually-transmissible spirochete it is derived from, syphillis.  The latest Stricker/Savely paper states "Whether [Morgellons] disease  is transmissible by human contact remains unclear, but preliminary evidence suggest that it is not. Although most sufferers are fearful of infecting family members, the rare instances where all family members are affected appear to have a common exposure to an inciting agent."

Amy, Blake

 

But of course the tabloids are blaming her appearance on drug-abuse . That is a completely bogus argument... We've seen tons of major drug abusers in the 60's and 70's -- rock stars and Hollywood types -- and none of them looked anything like dermatologists are claiming as "drug induced formication" "drug induced delusional parasitosis" "coke mites" etc. The reality is that the DEA is putting up pictures of people with Morgellons as prototypical "this is how drug users look" but the reality is that the "look" has nothing to do with drug abuse, and everything to do with bioweapons designed to kill drug crops and "mark" drug users. So now drug users look like this: http://www.drugfree.org/Portal/DrugIssue/MethResources/faces/photo_8.html whereas in the past they looked like this: http://ratorecordsblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/csny-dj-vu-more.html

Same drugs... what changed? What changed is the War on Drugs and these "marking" bioweapons as outlined in the WPAFB documents FOIA'd above. The Mother Jones article "Drug Control or Biowarfare?" may well be the smoking gun of Morgellons where crop-control fusarium is shown to be infecting humans, farm animals, and effecting crops other than the target. The fusarium link with Morgellons is strong. The odd "silentsuperbug" site claims Morgellons is a genetically modified fusarium crossed with a cyanobacteria...

Unfortunately, with the significant rise in Morgellons cases, and the fact that babies and young children, who are clearly not drug abusers,

nor suffering from "delusional parasitosis" are getting this disease. It is clear that the infection has "escaped containment" and is no longer just afflicting drug users taking bioweapon-tainted drugs and spread to "mark" their immediate family and friends for further discrimination.

The issue is that people suffering from this emerging epidemic are not taken seriously and called "delusional" -- they are immediately discriminated-against by the medical profession, the workplace and peers as "looking like a drug user."  But they're a law-abiding citizen infected by the US's illegal (against Geneva Conventions) and immoral use of Bioweapons against it's own citizens. The public health costs of these bioweapons spreading suffering and death worldwide indicates that the war on drugs is truly an evil construct, causing far more suffering and societal damage than drug abuse could ever cause, both in terms of disease, lost productivity, broken families, and the USA's ranking as the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world.

The sunshine-project that FOIA'd the WPAFB document has the following observations on the US's use of bioweapons to fight the "war on drugs." -- http://www.sunshine-project.org/publications/bk/bk14.html
Apparently, although it's ok for the US to poison crops in Colombia and Peru, Florida balked at being the target of these bioweapons because it is so colossally stupid to use them:

As the head of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection pointed out: "Fusarium
species are capable of evolving rapidly. Mutagenicity is by far the
most disturbing factor in attempting to use a Fusarium species as a
bioherbicide. It is difficult, if not impossible to control the spread
of Fusarium species. The mutated fungi can cause disease in large
number of crops, including tomatoes, peppers, flowers, corn and vines
and are normally considered a threat to farmers as a pest, rather than
as a pesticide. (…) Fusarium species are more active in warm soils and
can stay resident in the soil for years. Their longevity and enhanced
activity under Florida conditions are of concern, as this could lead to
an increased risk of mutagenicity.

Posted by Niels P. Mayer in Medicine at 20080322 Comments[7]

Comments:

Niels .... this is the greatest 'discovery' and possible explaination of our disease!!! The 'Sunshine Project' article was amazing!!!

I wonder how many (if any) of us have been tested for fungal infections? The fungal connection here would explain the improvement by using the fenbendazole!!!

Our government is so corrupt in reguard to our 'Drug Policy'. I have heard that many believe that the US Government is directly involved in the World Wide Drug Trade FOR PROFIT to fund their Black Ops Activities. GREED, $$$$$$, POWER, (did I say greed?) ... Total hypocrites ... total disreguard for humanity and our environment.

Will we ever get an answer?

Posted by Wendy Tripp on March 22, 2008 at 03:03 PM PDT #

Good info about...
But more results could be optained with anti-bacterial/ antibiotic creams and less with anti-fungals, which may surely help with secondary infections or oportunistic infections as the increase of dermatopytes etc.
Anyway thanks Niels...

Sincerly Marc Neumann

Posted by Marc Neumann on April 03, 2008 at 03:52 AM PDT #

Marc Neuman has come up with the answer nobody could come up with in over 13 years in just one simple sentence. Thanks Mr. Neuman.

Part of the problem seems to be that like the AIDS virus, Morgellons has no cell membrane surrounding it, so standard methods of interfering with viral reproduction by attacking its ability form an enclosing cell membrane don't work. The lack of a cell membrane also make it much harder to see, even under the most powerful microscopes, so proper diagnosis is pretty much impossible for the average dermatologist who has little choice but to call it delusional in nature. Finally, my understanding is that diagnosis as anythying BUT delusional paracitosis without access to electron microscopic evidence, and then treating it as anything else opens the medical professional to all sorts of problems including malpractice, negative peer review including the loss of medical license, and severe governmental backlash which should NOT be the case if the government would allow open investication and really can't be proven to have engineered this and similar illnesses with the help of Merc since the mid 1940's in its biological weapons creation research programs.

Posted by David Curtis on July 05, 2008 at 02:06 PM PDT #


In response to David Curtis comment "can't be proven to have engineered this and similar illnesses"... this argument becomes increasingly harder to disprove
when there's coverups like the current Dr. Bruce Ivins
suicide/FBI-case:
http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/08/01/anthrax/index.html

How neat to be able to completely dead-end all further inquiries on the death of "lone gunman" Dr. Bruce Ivins, recently implicated in the 2001 Anthrax "mystery" attacks that helped draw the US into an illegal war with Iraq on the ruse that they had developed "weapons of mass destruction." Of course, every bioweapon in Iraq was straight from Ft. Detrick as the US supplied Iraq with bioweapons to fight our proxy war against Iran.

Dr. Ivins worked at Ft. Detrick for many years, with full access to all the known bioweapons, as well as the ones under development there, including the ones kept "on ice" after Nixon shut down Ft. Detrick's active research into producing bioweapons. Now they continue using those same bioweapons, except that they pretend to follow the geneva conventions through the ruse of "biodefense" ... Now they invent new weapons, and invent the antidote which only the elite will have access to.

In fact, Dr. Ivins was working on one of the elite antidotes -- for anthrax -- and in fact vaccinated himself with his vaccine -- which is how he was able to manufacture the anthrax and put it in all those letters without getting infected himself. Funny thing is that his Anthrax vaccine was apparently implicated in "Gulf War Syndrome" and in 2001, Dr. Ivins was having particularly bad mental problems as the military had decided to blame his vaccine for Gulf War Syndrome -- for the purpose of covering up the real reason behind gulf war syndrome -- it's one of the Ft. Detrick bioweapons we supplied to Saddam Hussein -- whose used it against our own troops during the Gulf War -- and brought it home to cause our sudden "mystery" increase in autism, alzheimers, cancer, autoimmune diseases, etc.

The reality is that gulf war syndrome was probably triggered by Ivins Anthrax vaccine, much like other vaccines have been implicated in triggering Autism. In both cases, the authorities are doing everything possible to actively deny the fact that US bioweapons were used against our own forces or "accidentally" released into the wild ... and that these forces brought back the infection... and triggered autism in their vaccinated children, after returning from the battlefield with the infection:
> These chronic bacterial infections can spread to immediate family
> members. In a recent study we found that spouses of veterans with Gulf
> War Illness and chronic infections, such as M. fermentans, were at high
> risk for the infection. We also found that the children (aged 2-11
> years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness and a positive test for
> mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans) often were diagnosed with
> Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon examination of the ASD patients
> we found that over 80% had the same infection as their veteran parent.
> The onset of ASD (after the veteran returned from service) and the
> presence of the same infection suggested transmission of the infection
> and its involvement in ASD. These chronic bacterial infections can
> spread to immediate family members. In a recent study we found that
> spouses of veterans with Gulf War Illness and chronic infections, such as
> M. fermentans, were at high risk for the infection. We also found that
> the children (aged 2-11 years) of Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Illness
> and a positive test for mycoplasmal infection (mostly M. fermentans)
> often were diagnosed with Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Upon
> examination of the ASD patients we found that over 80% had the same
> infection as their veteran parent. The onset of ASD (after the veteran
> returned from service) and the presence of the same infection suggested
> transmission of the infection and its involvement in ASD.

In fact, the denial is so far-reaching that the CDC decided to SETTLE (as in we give up, here's some hush money so that you don't ask any more questions)
a lawsuit that vaccines cause autism ( http://www.thedailygreen.com/environmental-news/latest/autism-vaccines-mercury-47030702 )
> Hannah's case is unique and that her rare condition led to a rare consequence.
>They say her case should not be extrapolated to the thousands of other autistic
>children whose parents think they were harmed by the vaccines."
Of course, if you look at "Hannah's case" you'll note that the poor girl clearly was infected with mycoplasma or lyme, both of which are bioweapons that are vigorously denied, ofbfuscated or simply ignored by the medical community as part of the coverup of US bioweapons being at the root of all our natuions health crises. The settlement effectively blocked further investigation into the infection-caused reason why vaccines trigger autism, giving us convenient misdirection through oft-repeated lies
"it's a medical mystery" or "every case is unique" (we put on lots of blindfolds to make them seem more similar).

Bottom line is that the military and medical establishment has a common response to any complaints by patients in response to their released bioweapons -- "it's all in the head" -- that was the response given to the gulf war veterans sickened by the bioweapons, it's the response given to why gulf-war vet families are similarly mistreaded with additional "folie a deux" "fole a famille' or "munchhausen's by proxy" diagnoses, it's the response given to those in the early stages of any of the demylinating neuro-degeneration that is triggered by the government's stealth disabler bioweapons.

In other words, just given the medical response by "authorities", Morgellons is clearly yet another Ft. Detrick bioweapon. Maybe Dr. Ivins has been busy for a long time?

Along with a "long history of mental problems" , it has been reported that Ivins also had a long history of "mailing packages from other postboxes" (for example, he mailed the antrax letters from a mailbox near Princeton sorority of a former love interest).

Of course, the FBI is now attempting to close this "solved mystery" in order to coverup the nasty evil work that taxpayers have been funding for decades at Ft. Detrick. Work that is illegal, immoral, and antithetical to USA's constitutional values. It's just fundamentally wrong.

They're not saying whether any of those other packages Ivins mailed out, contained, say, microscopic lyme/morgellonas infected mites, nypmph ticks, or nematode eggs. All of which could be stuffed in an envelope with powder and paper shavings... and mailed around to infect millions.

I'm sure he had access to whatever it was they've been spraying on drug crops for the purpose of infecting everybody involved in the drug trade, and drug users too. The bioweapons mentioned in my original blog-entry were probably developed at Ft. Detrick, and Bruce Ivins had access to them:

> Along with the other enormities presently perpetrated in the name of the
> War on Drugs, the United States is now actively preparing to deploy
> biological weapons. The weapons consist of plant pathogens designed to
> attack coca, cannabis and opium poppy crops.
> Research into the project has involved the resurrection of biological
> agents developed long ago at Fort Detrick, Maryland, center for the US
> biowar program closed down by President Nixon in 1969. Deep-frozen at
> the time of the program's termination, they are now being thawed out and
> readied for assault on producer countries in the third world. Also
> involved are veterans of the Soviet biological warfare effort, now being
> funded by the US through the connivance of an obscure UN agency,
> employed for this purpose in order to shield the US from well-deserved
> charges of violating the internationally negotiated biological weapons
> convention.
>
> The work is proceeding despite well attested evidence that the weapons,
> if deployed, will have profound and disastrous impact on the ecologies
> of the countries in which they are used. Furthermore, the USDA is now
> researching the use of genetic modification to enhance the potency of
> these bio-weapons. The principal agents under development are microbial
> pathogens.
>
> At the Institute for Genetics in Kazakhstan, former Soviet biowarriors
> are being financed by the US and Britain to test mycoherbicides-fungi,
> specifically Pleospora - to kill opium poppies and marijuana plants. In
> the Andes and western Amazon, the US is planning the testing and
> widespread application of fusarium oxysporum, an anti-coca fungus. The
> FY 2000 budget contains at least $23 million for these programs,
> although further appropriations are almost certainly buried in covert
> military and intelligence budgets.
>
> The prospect of being on the receiving end of a biological attack is not
> alluring to countries such as Peru, Bolivia and Colombia. The Peruvian
> government has already banned the testing and or deployment of the
> fungi. The Colombian government is similarly queasy, but has been
> sharply admonished by the project's supporters in the US Congress that
> if Colombia wants its $1.8 billion aid package, it had better take the
> fungi too.
>
> Last March, House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Benjamin Gilman,
> R-N.Y., added an amendment to the Colombian aid bill requiring President
> Clinton to certify that the Colombian government "has agreed to and is
> implementing a strategy to eliminate Colombia's total coca and opium
> poppy production" using, among other means, "tested, environmentally
> safe mycoherbicides." The amendment is still in the bill (which is still
> stalled in the senate) despite a submission by Colombian scientists to
> the Colombian Ombudsman for the Environment that the use of
> mycoherbicide agents in Colombia represents "a great danger both for
> Colombian humans as well as for the Colombian environment and
> biodiversity".
>
> It is easy to see why the Colombians are worried. The absolute
> requirement of this sort of weapon is that it should be "host specific",
> ie that it should attack only the intended victim and nothing else.
> According to Ed Hammond of the Sunshine Project, which has researched
> and publicized this enormity, tests conducted by USDA-contracted
> researchers in 1994 and 1995 using the favored strain of the fungus
> fusarium oxysporum-EN4-resulted in two non-coca species becoming
> infected.
>
> Furthermore, fusarium oxysporum strains that infect coca plants are
> closely related to those that attack yams, a staple in the Andean diet.
> This is hardly surprising, Hammond points out, in view of the fact that
> EN4 is designed to attack different strains of coca and therefore cannot
> be entirely host specific. Thus the rare and beautiful Agrias butterfly
> may soon fall as one more casualty of the War on Drugs, since its larvae
> feed and mature on wild relatives of the coca plant. One of the few
> remaining areas where Agrias can be found is the upper Putamayo river
> region, a center both of guerrilla activity and coca cultivation in
> Colombia and therefore a prime target for the US fungus spraying
> campaign.
>
> Meanwhile, back at the lab, USDA researchers have been working to create
> genetically modified strains of the fungi, including the cloning of
> fusarium strains that attack potatoes, in order to produce something
> still more vicious.
>
> However, in their search for instruments of what is officially known as
> "bio-control", the government's researchers have also, it seems, reached
> back into the past. Sometime before 1969, according to documents
> supplied to Hammond under the FOIA, a team from APHIS, the USDA's plant
> and animal inspection service, found a virus on a Datura tree imported
> from Cauca, Colombia. Someone, it is not clear who, determined that the
> virus could be useful as an anti-opium poppy agent, and it was
> dispatched to the US biological warfare center at Fort Detrick, Maryland
> under the label D-437.
>
> Following Nixon's order to close the place down, D-437 was not destroyed
> but put in deep frozen storage, forgotten by all but the researchers who
> had worked so happily at Detrick. On April 12 this year, Hammond caught
> a brief mention of D-437 on a US Army website, along with the fact that
> it was being studied by a Dr Vernon Damsteegt, himself a Detrick
> veteran. Following enquiries by Hammond, all mention of the virus and
> its custodian was hurriedly removed from the site, which now carried a
> fraudulent notification that it had last been updated on April 6.
> 1969 was the year Richard Nixon launched his war on drugs, using it to
> set up what was intended to be his very own secret police force - the
> Drug Enforcement Agency, a story chronicled in Edward J. Epstein's great
> book Agency of Fear.
>
> Biological warfare was integral to the US war against Vietnam.
> CounterPunchers will recall Agent Orange, the hellish brew deployed to
> defoliate the jungle. Agent Blue, targeted on rice production, is less
> well known. The aim was to wipe out the NLF's food supply. Rice
> plantations deemed to be servicing the enemy were duly sprayed and
> obliterated. Professor Matthew Meselsen recalls how, early in 1970, he
> was taken by a US Army Chemical Corps colonel to survey a valley in an
> upland area that had been sprayed with Agent Blue some weeks before. As
> they flew over the devastated valley, the colonel proudly explained to
> Meselsen that this had obviously been an NLF food supply area since
> there were no houses to be seen.

Posted by Niels on August 11, 2008 at 05:35 PM PDT #

Very interesting and provocative. We have been tracking cases for years and have discovered our earliest cluster of cases arose in the mid to late 1970s. Cases arose in the l970s in New York, Chicago, and Texas and shared the characteristis of poorly healing lesions, fibers and creeping-crawling skin sensations as well as myriad other symptoms. Our conclusion is that we have to look to an earlier time for release of at least some of the organisms responsible for the condition known as "Morgellons"

Posted by george schwartz on May 05, 2009 at 03:00 AM PDT #

i am going to my internist today, to drop of a bug that came out of my skin last saturday morning. it horrified me!! i have been suffering from morgellons for 2 and 1/2 yrs now. constantly trying to find something to heal my face. i have those black dots, fibers coming out, horrific pain----my sores are so hard and hurt to the point i'm in tears. well anyway, i live in michigan, noone here has heard of it and there isnt anyone to speak to. but i am going to take my speciman with the internet guides on morgellons and i will pray that he gets this to the cdc and everyone will at last know that morgellons is caused by a parasite!!! it is not in anyones head!!!! because as soon as ii looked at this bug, i instantly could tell, where it attaches and how it gets around without being detected, even by the greates dermatologist at the uofm!!! beki

Posted by Beki on May 26, 2009 at 11:24 PM PDT #

Hi Niels and friends,

Google took me off completely of their index.
Google, Microsoft, AOL and so on are from the Bilderberg group. Microsoft tried to push me off with Copyright, which don`t work because it is all my work and pictures on my site. Google made it now by removing any link to morgellons-research.org site.
I would not use anymore google because they spy you totally out. They just don`t want if somebody helps the sufferers. All should die. We know that all the other researchers don`t do a shit!! Guess why...Good luck to you all
Marc

Posted by Marc Neumann on July 14, 2009 at 11:20 AM PDT #

Post a Comment:
  • HTML Syntax: NOT allowed